Ghanaian vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Carpatho Rusyn
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ghanaians
Carpatho Rusyns
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Ghanaian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,569,224 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 6.6 Carpatho Rusyns.
Ghanaian vs Carpatho Rusyn Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 22.1%), per capita income ($42,164 compared to $47,248, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $99,449, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $40,825, a difference of 0.98%), householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $61,093, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($83,582 compared to $86,635, a difference of 3.6%).
Income Metric | Ghanaian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,164 | Exceptional $47,248 |
Median Family Income | Poor $98,877 | Exceptional $107,502 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,582 | Good $86,635 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,440 | Exceptional $48,617 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,810 | Exceptional $57,572 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,429 | Exceptional $40,825 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,594 | Tragic $49,113 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $90,137 | Exceptional $99,449 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $97,277 | Good $102,777 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $60,043 | Average $61,093 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 27.3% |
Ghanaian vs Carpatho Rusyn Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.5%), family poverty (10.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 36.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.83%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Poverty Metric | Ghanaian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Poverty | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 21.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Fair 17.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.4% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Ghanaian vs Carpatho Rusyn Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.8%), male unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.8%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Ghanaian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.8% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Ghanaian vs Carpatho Rusyn Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.84%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ghanaian | Carpatho Rusyn |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Average 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 40.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 87.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Ghanaian vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (63.5% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.06, a difference of 7.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Ghanaian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 61.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 25.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.2% | Poor 45.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.06 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.3% | Good 30.9% |
Ghanaian vs Carpatho Rusyn Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 54.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ghanaian | Carpatho Rusyn |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.4% | Fair 10.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 83.6% | Fair 89.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 48.0% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Ghanaian vs Carpatho Rusyn Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 86.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Ghanaian | Carpatho Rusyn |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.8% | Exceptional 95.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Exceptional 94.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.7% | Exceptional 92.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 89.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 67.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.4% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Exceptional 42.1% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Exceptional 17.5% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ghanaian vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 33.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
Disability Metric | Ghanaian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Fair 11.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.1% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.5% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |