Hawaiian vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,362,840 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 14.6 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $47,248, a difference of 19.9%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $57,572, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $48,617, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,729 compared to $86,635, a difference of 2.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $102,777, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $61,093, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 30.6%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.29%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.8%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.94%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 61.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 57.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 18.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 1.6%).