Immigrants from Serbia vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,666,441 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Immigrant from Serbia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Serbia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.304% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Serbia corresponds to an increase of 303.5 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,321 compared to $49,113, a difference of 8.6%), per capita income ($50,810 compared to $47,248, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($43,385 compared to $40,825, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,155 compared to $99,449, a difference of 3.7%), householder income over 65 years ($63,387 compared to $61,093, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,569 compared to $102,777, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.8%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.94%), poverty (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 9.3%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.040%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and family households (61.6% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.4%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.1%).