Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chippewa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chippewa

Carpatho Rusyns

Fair
Good
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Chippewa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,140,435 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.935. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.172% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 171.8 Carpatho Rusyns.
Chippewa Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $47,248, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $99,449, a difference of 24.3%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $57,572, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $49,113, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,093, a difference of 13.5%).
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Income
Income MetricChippewaCarpatho Rusyn
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,631
Exceptional
$47,248
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,852
Exceptional
$107,502
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,539
Good
$86,635
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,287
Exceptional
$48,617
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,368
Exceptional
$57,572
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,003
Exceptional
$40,825
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,015
Tragic
$49,113
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,005
Exceptional
$99,449
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,943
Good
$102,777
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,847
Average
$61,093
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
27.3%

Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 49.0%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 42.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 19.4%).
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Poverty
Poverty MetricChippewaCarpatho Rusyn
Poverty
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
21.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.4%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.4%

Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 67.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.0%).
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChippewaCarpatho Rusyn
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.4%

Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChippewaCarpatho Rusyn
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.1%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
87.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
86.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.3%
Exceptional
83.5%

Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.4%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 40.8%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.06, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChippewaCarpatho Rusyn
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
61.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.1%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.06
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.6%
Good
30.9%

Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.9%).
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChippewaCarpatho Rusyn
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Fair
10.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
18.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.5%

Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 53.3%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.17%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Education Level
Education Level MetricChippewaCarpatho Rusyn
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
94.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
92.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
89.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
67.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.7%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
50.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
42.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 29.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.7%).
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability
Disability MetricChippewaCarpatho Rusyn
Disability
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.0%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%