Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Carpatho Rusyn
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Carpatho Rusyns
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,140,435 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.935. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.172% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 171.8 Carpatho Rusyns.
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $47,248, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $99,449, a difference of 24.3%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $57,572, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $49,113, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,093, a difference of 13.5%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Carpatho Rusyn |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $47,248 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $107,502 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Good $86,635 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $48,617 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $57,572 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $40,825 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $49,113 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $99,449 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Good $102,777 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Average $61,093 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.3% |
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 49.0%), male poverty (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 42.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 19.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Carpatho Rusyn |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 21.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Fair 17.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 67.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Carpatho Rusyn |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Good 5.4% |
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Carpatho Rusyn |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Average 65.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 40.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 87.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.4%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 40.8%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.06, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Carpatho Rusyn |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 61.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 25.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Poor 45.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.06 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Good 30.9% |
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Carpatho Rusyn |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Fair 10.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Fair 89.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 53.3%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.17%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Carpatho Rusyn |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 92.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 89.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 67.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 42.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chippewa vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 29.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.7%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Carpatho Rusyn |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Fair 11.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |