Dutch vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,804,624 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Dutch communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch corresponds to an increase of 41.4 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,605 compared to $47,248, a difference of 10.9%), median female earnings ($37,339 compared to $40,825, a difference of 9.3%), and wage/income gap (29.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,539 compared to $61,093, a difference of 2.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,650 compared to $102,777, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,265 compared to $49,113, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (22.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 10.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and single father poverty (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and female unemployment (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.06, a difference of 1.5%), births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 55.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 38.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.2%).