Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,234,962 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 28.0 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $59,837, a difference of 10.7%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $100,256, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $97,284, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $90,372, a difference of 0.78%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and median household income ($80,341 compared to $83,289, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in family households (64.8% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.9%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.9% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 0.080%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 90.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 14.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 27.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.6%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.040%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.27%).