Immigrants from Kuwait vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,031,557 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Kuwait communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kuwait within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kuwait corresponds to a decrease of 14.0 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 14.7%), median family income ($109,731 compared to $100,256, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,285 compared to $97,284, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,055 compared to $40,257, a difference of 2.0%), median earnings ($48,861 compared to $46,564, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,126 compared to $50,609, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.8% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.0%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 33.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.9%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.4%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.25%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.6%).