Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,227,312 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.077% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to a decrease of 76.6 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $59,837, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $40,257, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($82,560 compared to $83,289, a difference of 0.88%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $90,372, a difference of 0.88%), and median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $53,457, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.9%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.1%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.54%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.63%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.7%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.82%).