Immigrants from Caribbean vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 412,556,194 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.581. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 36.5 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $59,837, a difference of 23.3%), median family income ($83,319 compared to $100,256, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $97,284, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $50,609, a difference of 0.29%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $40,257, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,326 compared to $90,372, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 53.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 42.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (22.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.2%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 21.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 20.6%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (65.3% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 56.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 53.5%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 30.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.5%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.2%).