Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,989,463 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.086% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to a decrease of 85.6 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $42,950, a difference of 29.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,010 compared to $90,372, a difference of 23.9%), and median family income ($122,765 compared to $100,256, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $50,609, a difference of 5.9%), median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $40,257, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $59,837, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 37.6%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.8%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 46.9%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.6%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.1%).