Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,523,007 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.072% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 72.3 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $50,609, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $59,837, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,448 compared to $90,372, a difference of 0.090%), median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $40,257, a difference of 0.87%), and median earnings ($45,532 compared to $46,564, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.3%), receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and single female poverty (22.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 26.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.7%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 0.48%), currently married (43.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 105.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 17.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 40.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and college, under 1 year (61.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 43.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%).