French American Indian vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,979,102 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.359. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.350% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 349.5 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 9.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $59,837, a difference of 9.4%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $40,257, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $50,609, a difference of 3.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $90,372, a difference of 5.2%), and median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $53,457, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.8%), single female poverty (24.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.070%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.14%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 10.9%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.2%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.6%), master's degree (12.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.21%), high school diploma (88.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and male disability (13.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.5%).