Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,967,768 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 55.5 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $90,372, a difference of 19.1%), per capita income ($49,983 compared to $42,950, a difference of 16.4%), and median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $53,457, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $50,609, a difference of 7.0%), median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $40,257, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $59,837, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 23.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.7%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.78%), and family households (64.0% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.3%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.2%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and 2nd grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%).