White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,059,184 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,180 compared to $53,359, a difference of 26.5%), median family income ($99,800 compared to $122,764, a difference of 23.0%), and median household income ($82,029 compared to $100,711, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $55,932, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $69,774, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 31.4%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 28.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.95%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 25.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 62.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.5%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 56.2%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 9th grade (95.8% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 54.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 32.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.5%).