White/Caucasian vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,093,924 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,180 compared to $49,862, a difference of 18.2%), median household income ($82,029 compared to $93,960, a difference of 14.5%), and median family income ($99,800 compared to $112,665, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $54,154, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $65,246, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.6%), single female poverty (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and poverty (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.49%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.5%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 59.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 45.5%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.0%).