White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,626,489 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,029 compared to $99,943, a difference of 21.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $119,094, a difference of 21.4%), and median family income ($99,800 compared to $120,263, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $54,512, a difference of 8.3%), and median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $63,099, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.8%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 22.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 58.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.1%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 51.4%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.3% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.13%), high school diploma (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 47.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.9%).