White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,972,419 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,180 compared to $49,983, a difference of 18.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $107,650, a difference of 17.4%), and median household income ($82,029 compared to $96,292, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $54,179, a difference of 7.6%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $65,497, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.9%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.84%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and poverty (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 21.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 93.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 46.0%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.5%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.2% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.40%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 51.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.5%).