White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Poland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,210,382 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Poland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Immigrants from Poland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $41,630, a difference of 10.9%), median household income ($82,029 compared to $90,549, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $101,065, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $61,041, a difference of 3.7%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $58,452, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.0%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.4%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.24%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 50.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.4%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and bachelor's degree (35.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.20%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Poland communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.9%).