White/Caucasian vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,497,371 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 6.2 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $94,610, a difference of 3.2%), per capita income ($42,180 compared to $43,461, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $51,827, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.26%), householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $59,535, a difference of 1.2%), and median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $54,721, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.9%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.030%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.6%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.31%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.87%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.71%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.7%), associate's degree (44.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and college, 1 year or more (57.6% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.1%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.8%).