White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Community Comparison

COMPARE

White/Caucasian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Whites/Caucasians

Brazilians

Average
Good
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Brazilian Integration in White/Caucasian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,406,214 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Brazilians.
White/Caucasian Integration in Brazilian Communities

White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,180 compared to $46,700, a difference of 10.7%), median household income ($82,029 compared to $88,934, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $54,335, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $61,465, a difference of 4.4%), median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $56,837, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $104,408, a difference of 6.4%).
White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Income
Income MetricWhite/CaucasianBrazilian
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,180
Exceptional
$46,700
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,800
Excellent
$106,942
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,029
Exceptional
$88,934
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,197
Exceptional
$48,356
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,925
Exceptional
$56,837
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,531
Excellent
$40,483
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,336
Exceptional
$54,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,668
Excellent
$98,267
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,091
Excellent
$104,408
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,847
Good
$61,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Tragic
26.7%

White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 23.2%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.18%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and poverty (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Poverty
Poverty MetricWhite/CaucasianBrazilian
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Good
11.9%
Families
Good
8.8%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Average
11.1%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Average
13.4%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.1%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.2%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Excellent
11.1%

White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricWhite/CaucasianBrazilian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.9%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%

White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricWhite/CaucasianBrazilian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.5%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
83.7%

White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.75%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (65.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricWhite/CaucasianBrazilian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.1%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Average
6.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Excellent
30.4%

White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 47.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 29.6%).
White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricWhite/CaucasianBrazilian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.8%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.4%

White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.5%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Education Level
Education Level MetricWhite/CaucasianBrazilian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.3%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.8%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.1%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.2%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.0%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.6%
Good
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
44.2%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%

White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
White/Caucasian vs Brazilian Disability
Disability MetricWhite/CaucasianBrazilian
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.3%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%