Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Sierra Leone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,391,408 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.106% in Immigrants from Sierra Leone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 106.0 Immigrants from Sierra Leone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 18.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $66,009, a difference of 7.1%), and median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $42,214, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($103,989 compared to $103,990, a difference of 0.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $103,227, a difference of 0.44%), and median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $53,905, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 8.1%), receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.8%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.12%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.0%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.060%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 7th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.63%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%).