Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,855,574 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 10.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $91,458, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $98,467, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,090 compared to $43,838, a difference of 0.58%), median earnings ($46,645 compared to $46,969, a difference of 0.69%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $61,157, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 14.0%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.2% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 9.9%), family households (65.9% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.45%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.2%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.3%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%).