Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,113,278 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 6.0 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $59,217, a difference of 9.1%), per capita income ($44,090 compared to $48,027, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $103,486, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $61,902, a difference of 0.43%), householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $54,484, a difference of 2.6%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.9%), family poverty (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.43%), receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.62%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.79%), currently married (46.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 36.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.6%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.72%).