Costa Rican vs Austrian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,567,000 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Austrians within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Austrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Austrians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 12.3%), median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $59,359, a difference of 9.4%), and per capita income ($44,090 compared to $48,116, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $51,898, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $40,923, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $64,470, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.6%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.6%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.71%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.69%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.7%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 14.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.9%).