Costa Rican vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,260,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.186% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 186.4 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $59,151, a difference of 4.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $99,126, a difference of 3.7%), and median family income ($103,989 compared to $100,414, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,090 compared to $44,068, a difference of 0.050%), median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $39,643, a difference of 0.050%), and median earnings ($46,645 compared to $46,548, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.99%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.59%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.0%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.46%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.48%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 23.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.41%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.4%).