Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Argentinean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Argentineans

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Argentinean Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,902,892 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.080% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 79.8 Argentineans.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Argentinean Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $49,862, a difference of 64.8%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $112,665, a difference of 56.1%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $93,960, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $54,154, a difference of 19.7%), wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $41,952, a difference of 26.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamArgentinean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Exceptional
$49,862
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Exceptional
$112,665
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Exceptional
$93,960
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$50,399
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Exceptional
$60,117
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Exceptional
$41,952
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Exceptional
$54,154
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Exceptional
$103,111
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Exceptional
$110,103
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Exceptional
$65,246
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 143.6%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 120.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 117.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 39.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 42.6%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 58.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamArgentinean
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
18.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
14.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
27.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 103.1%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 101.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 91.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.4%).
Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamArgentinean
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Good
5.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamArgentinean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
33.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Tragic
73.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 78.2%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 66.3%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamArgentinean
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
30.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 39.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.48%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.5%).
Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamArgentinean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
11.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Poor
54.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Fair
6.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 108.2%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 87.3%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%).
Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamArgentinean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Fair
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Fair
97.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Fair
95.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Average
93.7%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Good
92.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
91.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
63.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
51.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
18.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 83.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 78.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Argentinean Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamArgentinean
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%