Immigrants from Central America vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 291,117,875 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.635. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $49,862, a difference of 42.6%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $112,665, a difference of 32.5%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $60,117, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $54,154, a difference of 6.1%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $65,246, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 46.3%), married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.4%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.9%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.7%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (68.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.5%), no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 106.5%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 92.4%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 82.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.1%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.9%).