Fijian vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,487,994 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.199% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 198.6 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $49,862, a difference of 35.9%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $60,117, a difference of 31.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $110,103, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $54,154, a difference of 8.0%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $65,246, a difference of 14.9%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 29.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 27.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.68%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.0%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (46.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.8%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 102.5%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 102.2%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 76.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 40.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.6%).