Immigrants from Laos vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,611,282 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 16.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $83,937, a difference of 8.3%), and median household income ($78,327 compared to $72,402, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $49,997, a difference of 0.090%), median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $48,899, a difference of 0.60%), and per capita income ($37,857 compared to $36,651, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.5%), single female poverty (22.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 23.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 6.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 35.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.9%), family households with children (29.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.49, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 41.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.4%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.3%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.19%), high school diploma (86.6% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and 11th grade (90.5% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 45.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.2%).