Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Ute

Poor
Fair
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ute Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,289,876 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.867. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 34.649% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 34,649.3 Ute.
Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Ute Communities

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 32.6%), median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $34,960, a difference of 14.2%), and per capita income ($41,709 compared to $36,651, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $52,949, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($51,642 compared to $48,899, a difference of 5.6%), and median family income ($94,665 compared to $87,596, a difference of 8.1%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BangladeshUte
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,709
Tragic
$36,651
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,665
Tragic
$87,596
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,722
Tragic
$72,402
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Tragic
$41,051
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,642
Tragic
$48,899
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,910
Tragic
$34,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,714
Tragic
$49,997
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,448
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$92,208
Tragic
$83,937
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,394
Tragic
$52,949
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
27.8%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (22.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 27.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty (16.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BangladeshUte
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
16.9%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
16.2%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
17.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
25.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
17.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
23.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
15.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
35.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
14.7%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.52%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BangladeshUte
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
11.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BangladeshUte
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
60.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.0%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
76.6%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 43.0%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.59%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BangladeshUte
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.1%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
43.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Poor
33.0%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 124.6%), no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 122.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 19.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 45.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 81.1%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshUte
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
25.8%
Tragic
11.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
74.3%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.2%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 32.0%), and bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (85.5% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and 12th grade, no diploma (88.0% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BangladeshUte
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Tragic
91.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
89.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.5%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
81.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
53.8%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Ute communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 44.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 0.93%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Ute Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshUte
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Exceptional
0.86%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.5%