Immigrants from Latvia vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,127,520 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 56.0 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $36,651, a difference of 38.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $83,937, a difference of 32.8%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $87,596, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $49,997, a difference of 3.5%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $52,949, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (10.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 54.8%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 53.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.5%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 53.2%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (62.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 59.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 30.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.75%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 62.6%), bachelor's degree (45.1% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 46.1%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 44.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.75%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.1%).