Immigrants from Asia vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,468,951 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $83,937, a difference of 38.9%), median household income ($99,933 compared to $72,402, a difference of 38.0%), and per capita income ($49,741 compared to $36,651, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $49,997, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $34,960, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 63.6%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 58.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 42.0%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.49, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.2%), bachelor's degree (44.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 43.3%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and 9th grade (94.4% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 41.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 27.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.9%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.0%).