Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,901,626 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,806 compared to $36,651, a difference of 46.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,222 compared to $83,937, a difference of 45.6%), and median household income ($104,796 compared to $72,402, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $49,997, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $52,949, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 74.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 64.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 63.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.2%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 56.8%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 39.4%), and births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.89%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.49, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 77.7%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 63.4%), and bachelor's degree (48.1% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.17%), 9th grade (94.6% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 52.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 34.6%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.9%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.8%).