Hawaiian vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,095,703 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.987. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.171% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 170.7 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $52,949, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $83,937, a difference of 17.7%), and median household income ($84,729 compared to $72,402, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $48,899, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $49,997, a difference of 6.2%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $41,051, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (11.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 41.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 35.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 36.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (28.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.49, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 44.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and associate's degree (40.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and 6th grade (96.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 41.5%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.1%).