Latvian vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,052,738 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 18.2 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $36,651, a difference of 43.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $83,937, a difference of 38.2%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $87,596, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.33%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $49,997, a difference of 5.6%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $34,960, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 70.3%), male poverty (9.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 69.7%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 41.0%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 43.0%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.60%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 69.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 55.3%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 52.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%).