Scandinavian vs Samoan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Samoans

Good
Fair
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Samoan Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,140,691 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.145% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 145.1 Samoans.
Scandinavian Integration in Samoan Communities

Scandinavian vs Samoan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 12.0%), per capita income ($43,848 compared to $39,826, a difference of 10.1%), and median male earnings ($55,527 compared to $51,389, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,073 compared to $86,498, a difference of 0.49%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $101,580, a difference of 1.4%), and median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $37,498, a difference of 2.1%).
Scandinavian vs Samoan Income
Income MetricScandinavianSamoan
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Tragic
$39,826
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Fair
$100,344
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Good
$86,498
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Tragic
$44,206
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Tragic
$51,389
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Tragic
$37,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Exceptional
$54,610
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Fair
$92,385
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Good
$101,580
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Exceptional
$65,427
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Fair
26.0%

Scandinavian vs Samoan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 24.0%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.6%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Scandinavian vs Samoan Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianSamoan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Good
8.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
13.8%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Fair
12.1%

Scandinavian vs Samoan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.2%), female unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.6%).
Scandinavian vs Samoan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianSamoan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.4%

Scandinavian vs Samoan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Scandinavian vs Samoan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianSamoan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
81.8%

Scandinavian vs Samoan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (65.0% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Scandinavian vs Samoan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianSamoan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
67.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Average
46.8%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Fair
32.6%

Scandinavian vs Samoan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.5%), no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Scandinavian vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianSamoan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
25.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
9.2%

Scandinavian vs Samoan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 50.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%).
Scandinavian vs Samoan Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianSamoan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Fair
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Tragic
41.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Tragic
31.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
11.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

Scandinavian vs Samoan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.95%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Scandinavian vs Samoan Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianSamoan
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
49.5%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%