Scandinavian vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Burmese

Good
Exceptional
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 411,839,076 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 4.2 Burmese.
Scandinavian Integration in Burmese Communities

Scandinavian vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,073 compared to $103,145, a difference of 19.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,596 compared to $113,701, a difference of 18.9%), and per capita income ($43,848 compared to $52,005, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $54,800, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $71,139, a difference of 15.5%).
Scandinavian vs Burmese Income
Income MetricScandinavianBurmese
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Tragic
28.0%

Scandinavian vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 18.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and poverty (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
Scandinavian vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianBurmese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%

Scandinavian vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Scandinavian vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Scandinavian vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 26.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.70%).
Scandinavian vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Scandinavian vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.0%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.6% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 0.50%), family households (65.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Scandinavian vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Exceptional
26.4%

Scandinavian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 14.4%).
Scandinavian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.8%

Scandinavian vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 45.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 43.8%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Scandinavian vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.6%

Scandinavian vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 37.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.7%).
Scandinavian vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%