Scandinavian vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Chinese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Scandinavians
Chinese
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Chinese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,332,033 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,670,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 13.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 36.0% | 17.1% |
| Range | 33.5% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 4.2% |
| Median | 5.1% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Scotland (4.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Danish (4.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Cypriot (4.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Finnish (4.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Estonian (4.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.6%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |