Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,195,679 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.451% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 450.6 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.6%), median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $41,375, a difference of 8.0%), and per capita income ($43,848 compared to $46,876, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $52,190, a difference of 0.89%), householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $62,645, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $106,217, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 43.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.30%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 25.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.5%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and family households (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 57.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.4%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (67.7% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.3%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.0%).