Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Zimbabweans

Good
Exceptional
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,367,752 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.447. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Zimbabweans.
Scandinavian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 10.6%), householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $65,854, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $40,798, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,527 compared to $56,302, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,596 compared to $98,586, a difference of 3.1%).
Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricScandinavianZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Fair
26.3%

Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.3%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.22%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.31%).
Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.5%

Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%

Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.6%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.24%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.9%).
Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Exceptional
28.7%

Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.6%).
Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Good
6.4%

Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.9%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.3%

Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.2%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.2%).
Scandinavian vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%