Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,481,559 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.242% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 241.6 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 20.7%), median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $42,229, a difference of 10.2%), and median earnings ($46,433 compared to $49,368, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $102,015, a difference of 0.94%), median family income ($104,410 compared to $105,964, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $60,647, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.070%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 19.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (49.6% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 12.1%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 79.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 56.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 44.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 50.4%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.0% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.1%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.1%).