Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,007,066 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to a decrease of 38.0 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $122,222, a difference of 44.5%), median household income ($72,576 compared to $104,796, a difference of 44.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,774 compared to $118,056, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $57,123, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $69,872, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 55.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 47.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 52.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 44.7%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.5%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.8%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 53.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 89.8%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 84.4%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 68.0%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 54.2%), and male disability (14.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.5%).