Potawatomi vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Romanians

Fair
Excellent
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,902,810 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 60.4 Romanians.
Potawatomi Integration in Romanian Communities

Potawatomi vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $108,609, a difference of 28.4%), per capita income ($38,046 compared to $48,445, a difference of 27.3%), and median household income ($72,576 compared to $91,994, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.84%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $53,632, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $64,142, a difference of 18.3%).
Potawatomi vs Romanian Income
Income MetricPotawatomiRomanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
28.0%

Potawatomi vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 31.4%), single female poverty (25.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.0%).
Potawatomi vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiRomanian
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Exceptional
10.4%

Potawatomi vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Potawatomi vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiRomanian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Potawatomi vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Potawatomi vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Good
83.0%

Potawatomi vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 26.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.50%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Potawatomi vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiRomanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Exceptional
28.7%

Potawatomi vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.3%).
Potawatomi vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
6.2%

Potawatomi vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.4%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 42.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
Potawatomi vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.1%

Potawatomi vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 39.2%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.5%).
Potawatomi vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiRomanian
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Good
2.4%