Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Potawatomi
Chickasaw
15.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,014,628 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 15.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 3.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Potawatomi | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 96.6% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 28.9% | 25.6% |
| Median | 24.3% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.7% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.6% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.3% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are American (15.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Ute (15.7%, a difference of 0.57%), Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |