Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Zimbabweans

Fair
Exceptional
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,256,961 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.890. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 45.2 Zimbabweans.
Potawatomi Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $106,849, a difference of 26.3%), median household income ($72,576 compared to $90,618, a difference of 24.9%), and median family income ($88,265 compared to $110,011, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $51,259, a difference of 10.3%), and median male earnings ($48,768 compared to $56,302, a difference of 15.4%).
Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricPotawatomiZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Fair
26.3%

Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 41.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 38.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 16.0%).
Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Exceptional
9.5%

Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.5%).
Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiZimbabwean
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%

Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 26.3%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (63.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Exceptional
28.7%

Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
6.4%

Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 46.9%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).
Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.2%), and ambulatory disability (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.1%).
Potawatomi vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%