Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Western Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,440,337 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.100% in Immigrants from Western Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to a decrease of 100.1 Immigrants from Western Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $106,217, a difference of 25.5%), median household income ($72,576 compared to $90,005, a difference of 24.0%), and per capita income ($38,046 compared to $46,876, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.4%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $52,190, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $62,645, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.8%), single female poverty (25.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and single male poverty (15.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 33.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.84%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 25.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 51.9%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 44.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Western Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.6%).