Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,506,733 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.471. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,316 compared to $39,194, a difference of 25.8%), median male earnings ($60,958 compared to $50,772, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $88,291, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $58,244, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $51,615, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 23.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.58%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (64.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.31, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 76.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 30.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 54.4%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 46.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.76%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.7%).