Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,743,268 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $50,772, a difference of 35.8%), per capita income ($52,660 compared to $39,194, a difference of 34.4%), and median family income ($125,956 compared to $95,230, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $51,615, a difference of 12.0%), wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $58,244, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 43.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 40.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.9%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 37.3%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (30.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 0.74%), family households (66.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.31, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 80.6%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 73.8%), and master's degree (20.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 40.8%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.8%).