South American Indian vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

South American Indians

Malaysians

Average
Fair
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in South American Indian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,108,593 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.370% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 2,370.0 Malaysians.
South American Indian Integration in Malaysian Communities

South American Indian vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,206 compared to $39,194, a difference of 12.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,497 compared to $88,291, a difference of 9.3%), and median family income ($103,624 compared to $95,230, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $51,615, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $58,244, a difference of 6.8%).
South American Indian vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricSouth American IndianMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,206
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Good
$103,624
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,446
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Good
$46,952
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,508
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,019
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,979
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,497
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,171
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,215
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Excellent
25.0%

South American Indian vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.40%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
South American Indian vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricSouth American IndianMalaysian
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Fair
9.1%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
12.7%

South American Indian vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
South American Indian vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSouth American IndianMalaysian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.6%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Fair
5.5%

South American Indian vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.50%).
South American Indian vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSouth American IndianMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
82.0%

South American Indian vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.3%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.31%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.31, a difference of 1.4%).
South American Indian vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSouth American IndianMalaysian
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.26
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.7%
Tragic
33.9%

South American Indian vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 56.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.4%).
South American Indian vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSouth American IndianMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
7.7%

South American Indian vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 40.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.6%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.54%), 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.55%).
South American Indian vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricSouth American IndianMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.5%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.0%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.3%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

South American Indian vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
South American Indian vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricSouth American IndianMalaysian
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.1%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%