Japanese vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,602,427 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 37.0 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,624 compared to $88,291, a difference of 3.8%), and median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $37,298, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $58,244, a difference of 0.56%), median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $50,772, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $51,615, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.54%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 3.8%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.31, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.0%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (41.7% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.8%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.77%).